Between Iraq And A Hard Place
JSPAN sponsors a discussion of the
war.
Over 150 people braved stormy weather to attend the program "Iraq: Finding the
Right Road" on the evening of November 16th. After a welcome by Board Chair
Sue Myers, President Jeff Pasek explained that the program would bring the
issues into focus so as to permit JSPAN to adopt a policy position with respect
to the future course of the U.S. in Iraq.
Edward Turzanski, Senior Fellow of the Foreign Policy Research Institute, spoke
in support of continuing the present course. He stated that the Sunni minority
in Iraq has missed two out of three chances to take part in the future of their
country, with the third opportunity coming up: elections scheduled for December
15, 2005, to choose a new national assembly. Turzanski urges us to watch this
event, and the Sunni participation in it, as a key indicator of a brighter
future. He expressed the importance of a working democracy (even an imperfect
one) in Iraq to put pressure on Syria and other Arab states to provide key
rights to their citizens, including the right to vote, free speech and a free
press. As for the benefits of fighting to establish democracy in the Middle
East, Turzanski restated the long-held view that democracies do not fight wars
against each other.
Dick Polman, national political analyst for The Philadelphia Inquirer, examined
the reasons for the decline in support for the war, and the political
implications of the decline in the President's approval ratings in the upcoming
election year. Polman perceives the issue of Iraq as straddling party politics,
recognizing that a great many Democrats in Congress joined Republicans in
voting to grant the President the power to take military action. Polman sees
significance in the resolution that passed the Senate a day before the JSPAN
program, calling on the President to provide quarterly reports on the progress
of the war (although that resolution does not actually require any measure of
success to be achieved or any deadline to be set for the U.S. to withdraw).
Rabbi Seymour Rosenbloom, spiritual leader of Congregation Adath Jeshurun, spoke
vehemently against the war on moral grounds. He urged that although Jewish law
allows defensive wars, there is no defense interest on behalf of the United
States in Iraq. With the failure to find weapons of mass destruction, the
original main argument for the war has been removed, but the Administration has
suggested that fighting terror is a further reason - a viewpoint that does not
impress the Rabbi in light of the absence of any indication that terrorists
operated from Iraq prior to the invasion. Nor is Rosenbloom impressed with the
most recent argument, that the U.S. lives already lost cannot be allowed to
have been spent in vain. With 2,100 American lives and an estimated 30,000
Iraqi lives lost, the Rabbi called for an "immediate" withdrawal, concluding
with the observation that each life lost represents not just a single death,
but a loss of all the children, grandchildren and further descendants that
individual might have produced - each lost life "a world in itself."
A lively question and answer period was followed by refreshments and additional conversation before returning to the rainy night for the trip home.
|