Letters to the Editor
The Responsibility of Religious Organizations to our Children
As Protecting Your Children
pointed out sexual abuse happens in all settings,
but institutions where children attend and learn are often 'magnets' for predators.
It's crucial that religious organizations particularly work hard to both protect
the vulnerable and heal the wounded.
We hope that your readers circulate the valuable information in this article
to friends, family and colleagues.
-- Barbara Dorris, St. Louis, Missouri
Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests
Preventing Sexual Abuse
It is unfortunate that an attempt to teach
children how to stay safe made it to a political commercial with such
biased and completely inaccurate information. However, I appreciate
that you picked it up and made a point to disseminate
accurate
information in such a normalizing way. Because I work with children who
have been sexually abused, I am in a position of offering this
information to stop something from happening again. I like
opportunities to help educate parents and children on how to stay safe
from a prevention perspective.
-- Christine Downs, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Safe Place, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
"Pragmatic skeptic" vs "worried Jew"
What gives Aaron Ahuvia
such confidence that the Palestinians are a threat to Israel?
Ari Shavit and
Shimon Peres recently
spoke about the weakness of the Palestinian authority.
Why does Ahuvia
assume that a theoretical Palestinian State would have to attack Israel alone?
Would they not get help from their allies?
I do not object to your effort to simplify the analysis but I do think it is
wrong to lump Jews with very good reason to be concerned into the category "worried Jews" thereby denigrating them as somehow childish or neurotic. Let's have a serious discussion of credible threats.
I have listened very carefully to the arguments made for Ahuvia's case by people
such as Daniel Levy and
it seems to me that what we are dealing with is a debate over assumptions about
what the Arabs will do under different circumstances.
I would like to see more evidence to support your assumptions before any steps are
taken that cannot be reversed and that place millions of Jewish lives under grave
threat. I have no doubt that all on his side are acting in good faith and that
he believes his proposals will lead to peace.
However, I am not convinced by the evidence.
This does not in my view qualify me for the label "worried Jew"
--- I would rather adopt the title "pragmatic skeptic".
-- Yocheved Seidman, New York, NY
There is a legitimate problem for sole proprietors like Joe the Plumber. The way our tax code is written, the personal income Joe draws from his business is not the only income which is taxed: his Schedule C business profits are added to his personal income; the resulting sum is used to compute a higher tax rate than would be attributed to the proprietor’s personal income alone. This problem persists under either the McCain or Obama tax plan.
By contrast, the Chairman and CEO of a corporation pays taxes only on his own personal income. New forms of corporate partnerships have been invented – for instance the legal liability company (LLC) – to avoid similar tax disadvantages from non-corporate partnerships.
Joe’s $250,000 business jumps Joe’s personal income under proposed higher marginal rates from his $100,000 actually taken home, under current methods of personal income currently in force. Such business income is computed under Schedule C, and contributes to Joe’s adjusted gross income. If instead, sole proprietorship income were considered an investment – and computed like many other specialized investment income types in Schedule D Part IV,
- Joe’s personal income tax rate would be based solely on his personal income;
- Joe’s business income tax rate could be computed on the basis of corporate tax rates or his personal tax rate, whichever is less.
Under such a tax code, Joe’s increased tax rate would not be increased by his proprietorship income. Under such a tax code, there would be no discrimination of corporate taxation over sole proprietorships or non-corporate partnerships. Under such a tax code, a proprietorship would be considered an investment asset, rather than as a tax liability.
As Jews, we are commanded to pursue justice. We can afford to show some sympathy even to people like Joe.
-- Ben Burrows, Elkins Park, PA
The Philadelphia Jewish Voice welcomes the
submission
of articles and letters to the editor
letters @ pjvoice.com. Please include name, address
and phone number for identification purposes. We cannot publish every submission
we receive. We also reserve the right to edit submissions for length, clarity,
grammar, accuracy, and style, though we will never intentionally distort the
author's intent.
Editor-in-chief Adena Potok
editor @ pjvoice.com.
Did you enjoy this article?
If so,
- share it with your friends
so they do not miss out on this article,
- subscribe
(free), so you do not miss out on the next issue,
-
 donate
(not quite free but greatly appreciated) to enable us to continue
providing this free service.
If not,
|